Brand new questionnaire contains step three bits. Part I included issues from socio-group research (ages, number of knowledge, parity, familial income, job, current marital status, sexual pastime, reputation of HPV vaccination, and you will reputation of irregular cervical malignant tumors assessment).
Region II composed of six questions relating to the target women who will likely be screened, decades first off, volume, decades otherwise criteria to avoid away from evaluating, and techniques of evaluating. Just the users who’d ever heard off HPV perform just do it so you can Area III hence reviewed knowledge about HPV out-of their method of (oncogenic or low-oncogenic), mode out-of transmission and you will prevention.
Prior to the data, the newest survey away from region II and you may region III in Thai adaptation was in fact considered, discussed, and you will modified up to consensus certainly 20 experts who were most of the gynecologic oncologists (specific was basically experts various other parallel education). The professionals ranked each of 19 concerns once the both ‘relevant’ or ‘not relevant’. The thing-level Posts Validity List (I-CVI) try determined for every product, getbride.org naviger til dette websted plus the Articles Legitimacy List (CVI) try computed by firmly taking an average ratio away from 14 questions about knowledge about cervical malignant tumors evaluation and 5 questions relating to HPV. The fresh new CVI was 1 for both components of the brand new questionnaire (S1 Table). New precision is checked out from inside the 29 female with the same trait since the people. The fresh Cronbach’ alpha coefficients towards reliability was indeed 0.819 to possess information about cervical cancer evaluation and you can 0.907 to own understanding of HPV.
Investigation range
Into date from planned colposcopy, the analysis assistant given pointers of your own studies into the women exactly who fulfilled introduction requirements. The ladies which agreed to participate provided composed advised consent and you can responded brand new questionnaire independently on their own before proceeding so you’re able to colposcopy.
Investigation accumulated for it studies was indeed socio-market studies (Region I of survey), experience with cervical cancer assessment (Part II), and you will expertise in HPV (Part III).
Analytical research
This new answers of knowledge from the cervical disease screening and you will HPV was basically analyzed of the for every single goods before rating categorization. Proper answer try obtained just like the step 1 whereas ‘wrong and you will unsure answer’ is scored 0.
Out-of fourteen concerns regarding cervical malignant tumors screening, feminine whose score had been ? ten had been randomly categorized while the that have ‘an excellent knowledge’ normally had been considered as that have “not good education”. To own knowledge of HPV, female whoever address are ‘never observed HPV’ was excluded regarding the study of HPV training.
Away from 5 questions, feminine whose score was basically ? step three was indeed regarded as with ‘an excellent knowledge of HPV’ otherwise just like the ‘unhealthy knowledge’. Off 19 questions, female whoever get was in fact ? thirteen have been categorized due to the fact which have ‘an effective total knowledge’ usually once the ‘negative total knowledge’.
Most of the data was indeed gathered for the an electronic digital databases and you may examined having fun with SPSS V.twenty six.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics were utilized to analyze demographic studies and you can was described since numbers which have percentage, imply with practical deviation otherwise median which have assortment. The newest association anywhere between each changeable and you can education score was reviewed playing with simple linear regression. Exploratory model was made in multivariable studies and all the parameters probably associated with the knowledge score. The fresh believed number of analytical significance is good p-property value 0.05 or faster.
Results
Out of 500 women who met inclusion criteria and were invited to the study, one ong 499 women who responded to the questionnaire about knowledge of cervical cancer and screening (part II) and knowledge about HPV (part II), two did not provide personal information. So demographic data were available in only 497 women (Table 1). The mean age of 497 participants was years (SD ± ). More than half of the participants were aged < 40>